The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) was enacted in 2016 to provide a comprehensive system for the determination of bankruptcy and insolvency in India. The IBC points to providing a time-bound process for the determination of bankruptcy, intending to maximize the value of the assets of the indebted person for the benefit of all creditors. The IBC has been broadly hailed as a game changer for the Indian economy, providing a much-needed system for the determination of insolvency and bankruptcy. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are a critical component of the Indian economy, accounting for around 45% of the country's industrial output and 40% of exports. In any case, SMEs have customarily confronted critical challenges in getting on track and settling bankruptcies.

The impact of IBC on SMEs:

The IBC influences SMEs in several ways. One of the foremost critical impacts is the impact on SME debtors and creditors. Under the IBC, SME-indebted individuals can start the resolution process by filing for bankruptcy. This permits them to resolve their money-related troubles and proceed with their operations. The IBC benefits SMEs as well since it provides a deadline-driven procedure for determining bankruptcy. This lowers the ambiguity around the bankruptcy determination and enables lenders to promptly recoup their obligations. However, the IBC also poses challenges for SMEs. The expense of the insolvency resolution process is one of the biggest obstacles. The hiring of an insolvency professional is mandated by the IBC, and SMEs may find the expense of these services to be prohibitively expensive. Additionally, SMEs may find it difficult to overcome their financial challenges within the allotted
time frame because of the time-bound nature of the IBC.

Challenges faced by SMEs in the IBC process:

Expensive insolvency resolution procedure: The IBC process requires the hiring of an insolvency specialist, which can be expensive for small and medium-sized businesses. Furthermore, SMEs may face a substantial financial burden from the process's accompanying legal bills and other costs.

Lack of expertise: Because the IBC procedure can be complicated, SMEs might not have the know-how to handle it well. This could cause errors and delays in the settlement process, which would be bad for the SME.

Fewer resolution choices: The IBC process largely concentrates on liquidation and offers few options for resolution that would enable SMEs to carry on with their business. This may result in jobs being lost and profitable enterprises closing.

Limited access to financing: Because of the uncertainty surrounding the process's result, potential lenders may be reluctant to provide funding to SMEs, which can make the IBC process challenging for them to access. SMEs may find it challenging to carry on with business as usual and overcome financial setbacks as a result.

Recommendations and Guidance for improvements in the IBC for SMEs:

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides a framework for the
resolution of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) insolvency, but it also poses certain challenges for SMEs. To improve the IBC process for SMEs, the following recommendations can be considered:
1. To settle cases more quickly and effectively, it would be beneficial to establish specialist tribunals for SME insolvencies, composed of judges and experts with specific experience.

Providing SMEs with specific training: SMEs can comprehend and handle the IBC process more skillfully if they receive professional training on it. Training on the financial and legal ramifications of the IBC procedure may fall under this category.
Offering additional resolution options: The IBC procedure mostly concentrates on liquidation, which may result in the closure of successful companies and the loss of workers. Giving SMEs other choices for settlement—like debt restructuring and reorganization—would enable them to carry on with business as usual and pay back their creditors.

4. Offering financial support: SMEs may find it difficult to obtain financing due to the IBC procedure, which may make it difficult for SMEs to carry on with their business. Financial aid, in the form of grants or loans backed by the government, would enable SMEs to overcome their financial challenges and carry on with their business.

Conclusion 
In conclusion, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has had a critical effect on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India by providing a framework for the resolution of SME bankruptcies. In any case, the IBC process can be challenging for SMEs, and it is critical to address these challenges viably.
The suggestions specified within the blog, such as building up specialized tribunals for SME bankruptcies, providing specialized training for SMEs, providing more options for determination, rearranging the method, giving financial assistance, and empowering early mediation, seem to offer assistance in moving forward the IBC handle for SMEs.

Have questions or need expert legal advice? Don't hesitate to reach out to us!
Call us at 011-46101849 or +91-8178800668, or drop us an email at info@ccalegalfirm.com. Our team at CCA Legal Firm is here to assist you.